Farmacie pro praxi. 2023;19(3):168-171

Monoclonal antibodies in neurology - treatment of multiple sclerosis and migraines

Olga Bartošová
Farmakologický ústav VFN a 1. LF UK, Praha

Monoclonal antibodies have become a mainstay in the treatment of patients with multiple sclerosis. Their mechanism of action targets distinct immune mechanisms of multiple sclerosis pathophysiology. Natalizumab acts by binding to cell surface receptors and thus prevents the migration of leukocytes across the blood-brain barrier. Alemtuzumab, rituximab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab and ublituximab eliminate a selected population of pathogenic cells. Opicinumab acts as a transmembrane signaling protein (LINGO-1) antagonist. These drugs are an important pillar in the treatment of scattered. However, potential side effects can be serious and may require discontinuation of treatment. Above all, it is a risk of opportunistic infections, but also of secondary autoimmune diseases or malignancies. Monoclonal antibodies that bind to and inhibit the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor are used to treat and prevent migraines. CGRP monoclonal antibodies are the first specific prophylaxis based on knowledge of the pathophysiology of migraine. A whole series of clinical studies indicate a new possibility in the treatment and prophylaxis of migraines, which should reduce the risks resulting from the overuse of other groups of drugs, especially non-steroidal anti-inflammatory analgesics.

Keywords: multiple sclerosis, migraine, CD20 antibody, CGRP antibody, prophylactic therapy.

Accepted: September 21, 2023; Published: October 2, 2023  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Bartošová O. Monoclonal antibodies in neurology - treatment of multiple sclerosis and migraines. Pharmacy for Practice. 2023;19(3):168-171.
Download citation

References

  1. Thompson AJ, Baranzini SE, Geurts J, et al. Multiple sclerosis. Lancet. 2018;391(10130):1622-36. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Diaz C, Zarco LA, Rivera DM. Highly active multiple sclerosis: An update. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019;30:215-24. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Serra Lopez­‑Matencio JM, Perez Garcia Y, Meca­‑Lallana V, et al. Evaluation of Natalizumab Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamyics: Toward Individualized Doses. Front Neurol. 2021;12:716548. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Lemtrada. Summary of product characteristics: Sanof Belgium. 2020: Diegem, Belgium.
  5. Bar­‑Or A, Calabresi PA, Arnold D, et al. Rituximab in relapsingremitting multiple sclerosis: a 72-week, open­‑label, phase I trial. Ann Neurol. 2008;63(3):395-400. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Gingele S, Jacobus TL, Konen FF, et al. Ocrelizumab depletes CD20(+) T cells in multiple sclerosis patients. Cells. 2018;8(1). Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Hauser SL, Kappos L, Montalban X, et al. Safety of ocrelizumab in patients with relapsing and primary progressive multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2021;97(16):e1546-59. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Hauser SL, Bar­‑Or A, Cohen JA, et al. Ofatumumab versus teriflunomide in multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(6):546-57. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Fox E, Lovett­‑Racke AE, Gormley M, et al. A phase 2 multicenter study of ublituximab, a novel glycoengineered anti­‑CD20 monoclonal antibody, in patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2021;27(3):420-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Cadavid D, Mellion M, Hupperts R, et al. Safety and efficacy of opicinumab in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (SYNERGY): a randomised, placebo­‑controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Neurol 2019;18:845-56. 10. 1016/S1474-4422(19)30137-1. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Hepp, Z, Dodick DW, Varon SF, et al. Adherence to oral migraine­‑preventive medications among patients with chronic migraine. Cephalalgia 2015; 35(6): 478-488. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Edvinsson L. The CGRP Pathway in Migraine as a Viable Target for Therapies. Headache. 2018 May; 58 Suppl 1:33-47. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Reuter U, Goadsby PJ, Lanteri­‑Minet M, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of erenumab in patients with episodic migraine in whom two­‑to­‑four previous preventive treatments were unsuccessful: a randomised, double­‑blind, placebo­‑controlled, phase 3 b study. Lancet. 2018; 392(10161): 2280-2287. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. VanderPluym J, Dodick DW, Lipton RB, et al. Fremanezumab for preventive treatment of migraine: Functional status on headache­‑free days. Neurology. 2018; 91(12): e1152-e1165.
  15. Skljarevski V, Oakes TM, Zhang Q, et al. Effect of different doses of galcanezumab vs placebo for episodic migraine prevention: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2018;75(2):187-193. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Lipton RB, Goadsby PJ, Smith J, et al. Efficacy and safety of eptinezumab in patients with chronic migraine: PROMISE-2. Neurology. 2020; 94(13): e1365-e1377. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Nežádal T, Marková J, Bártková A et al. Mezinárodní klasifikace bolestí hlavy (ICHD-3) - oficiální český překlad. Cesk Slov Neurol N. 2020; 83/ 116(2): 145-152. Go to original source...




Pharmacy for Practice

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.